Wednesday, November 13, 2019

The River Why - Eddy quotes Essay -- essays research papers

Eddy Eddy changes Gus in three different ways: when she directly interacts with him, by her absence and by her reappearance. On their first encounter with one another Gus is compelled by her differences in dress, techniques and gear. After she leaves, Gus feels a â€Å"need† to fulfill his empty life. Finally when she shows back up in his life, Gus then has everything he could ever ask for: a beautiful woman who loves to fish, just like him. Page 151: â€Å"A barefoot girl. A full-grown one. One who wore the top tenth or so of what had long ago been a pair of blue jeans. One who wore a short, skin-tight, sleeveless sky-colored t-shirt through †¦which revealed the shape of the†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Gus describes his first view Eddy, after having snuck his way up to the tree where she sat â€Å"motionless† not noticing him. His attention is soon diverted, if not completely towards her odd pole and gear. Lying to himself as he checked out this â€Å"research project† he notices how her gear is like nothing he had seen or used before, but his mind never full wonders from Eddy. (Page 151) Page 151: â€Å"Her fishing equipment was innovative also; she appeared to have no creel or equipage or container of any kind apart form her pole and line and whatever was on the end of it. There was the possibility of a few spare hooks or leaders in the pockets of the fraction of blue jeans †¦but the theory grew tenuous†¦As to the possibility of fishing tackle concealed with in the sky-colored t-shirt, this was even less likely. Nevertheless I considered the problem long and carefully, scanning every least curve of the thin material, reluctant to give up the search.† While Gus is checking her style out he realizes that Eddy was important and he needed to learn from her. He describes his sudden thirst for knowledge about Eddy as follows: Page 150: â€Å"She must be an extraordinary person, well worth watching, well worth meeting, well worth thinking about, an exceptional fisherman, and I was, what I was, I was learning, yes learning: I was learning like crazy. I’d never learned so much so fast before†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Watching Eddy fish, Gus absorbs a lot of information that before was totally unseen to him. Not only about fishing, but about this woman and about himself, needing to learn from her. He says on page 152 â€Å"I felt for the first time that I was in the presence of a fishing genius exceeding my own.† He is enthralled by her fishin... ... a mouse could sing I just might see Eddy again.† Along his journeys Gus comes across a writer for a newspaper article and made up a story to the over zealous, unskilled fisherman, who wrote about fishing. In the end of the article he put a note to Eddy. Page 217: â€Å"Will the girl who ran form the guy who recited Izaak Walton I the tree please contact Gus on the other river he named. He has your rod and fish and wants to return them. He is totally harmless, but urges you to bring a loaded fun if frightened, as long as you come. Thank you.† Through out his waiting and searching for Eddy he changes dramatically. He feels the need for his live to be fulfilled, and he strives for it by doing new things. He acquires a new load of friends and things from swapping, but he was sad for those who did not have what he could have and for other reasons. Page 221: â€Å"†¦also because I had so much to share, but nobody to share it with.† Then Gus goes into making her a rod like her old one, but with improvements. Like a 14 foot pole, belly reel with a waist strap and some good line in it. The hope still lives on to see her once again and he is striving to make a good impression on Eddy this time.

Monday, November 11, 2019

Hiring Outsiders Essay

This is why companies look to hire people from the outside. They do this because they are looking with people who will bring unique skills to the company. Also, it can give the company new ideas and new energy for the work place. The article states that â€Å"the thought processes are common among workers and bosses, and  a new study  shows how they play out. The study, by  Matthew Bidwell, an assistant management professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, found that external hires, on average, make around 18 percent more money than internal employees with similar positions. I found this statement to be a very interesting point when it comes to the debate on whether or not to hire or not from the outside. It definitely shows that the numbers are better for profit, so that is definitely a big positive when it comes down to the question for managers who ask should they hire externally? However, later on in the article it states that in that same study, th ey perform less well in the first two years and are also more likely to leave or be let go. This is why companies don’t hire from the outside, because it takes to long for the employees to get use to the company they were hired at, rather then the one they were doing well at previously, this is one con of hiring from the outside. There are many other disadvantages about hiring from the outside as well. One of these factors would be it increases the chances of the work place morality to drop. What I mean by this is that if the people in the work place of the current company they are at hire other people for positions they are qualified for, this would possibly tick people within the company ff, and maybe even question those people if they should stay with the company or not. I remember you gave an example in class about how you were brought in for a company and one employee even confronted you and said how you took his job. This can definitely make the work place very uncomfortable for employees at the job. Just because a person did good at their current job does not mean they will automatically do good for the new company that hires them. The new employee will have to adapt to the new culture of the company and this can be very hard for new employees. Also, giving employees a chance to be promoted if they work hard is a benefit of hiring from the inside. This incentive definitely gives people something to work hard for and try to earn. I know for me, I don’t want to switch jobs a lot and if I were working at a place I would love the opportunity to keep moving up in the company if I was working hard. The article talks about how people within the company know the â€Å"do’s and don’ts of the company. † New people that companies bring in are unaware of what to do in certain situations and probably don’t have a very good idea of what the company is about compared to people that work within company. I definitely understand about what companies are trying to do from the outside, but some companies are blind to the fact that it will take a while for the new employees to gel in with everyone and the work place of the company. Overall, of course there is many benefits that include hiring from the outside, which include fresh skills and ideas. But the article states that Professor Groysberg says employers need to be much more strategic about hiring so that the organization has the right mix of old and new. This is a very important statement due to the fact that a company must decide is it really important that they absolutely need someone from the outside rather than someone who is already working there already? For employees that put in their two weeks because they are unhappy with the company hiring from the outside, the article has a very good solution for this. In the last meeting, it is important to ask what can we do to keep you here. Most of the time, people will say a raise. A good answer to this question would be we understand you want that but we don’t know if that’s possible, what else can we offer to you that is important to you? Answers like these will definitely help people from quitting to staying at the company.

Saturday, November 9, 2019

survey Example

Drafting The Interview/survey Example Drafting The Interview/survey – Essay Example ID Number & Drafting the Interview Survey Interview The person interviewed was notonly very informative but also very enthusiastic in sharing her thoughts and ideas with regards to the subject matter. After the actual interview, it is interesting to learn how the interviewee can provide subjective response to each of the research interview question. By asking open-ended research interview, the person being interviewed can provide her response based on her own personal experiences. During the actual interview, what struck me most is the research participant’s non-verbal cues. To each of my questions, the research interviewee was actually sending me different facial expressions and different body language. Each time she is in the process of thinking of what to tell me, she tends to either close her eyes for a second or stare blankly at the ceiling. Basically, her non-verbal actions made me realize why the use of a one-on-one interview is better than e-mail interviews. What I wan t to learn more is how to decode these non-verbal cues.Survey The actual survey results gave me a more generalized idea with regards to the research topic. The most interesting part of the research survey result is the pattern of their answers. Pertaining to how each of the research survey participant perceive the research questions, the pattern shown in the actual research survey results indicate the similarities and differences in their personal opinions. It is surprising to know that similarities in their response strongly suggest that the research survey participants have the same perception with regards to the research question. On the other hand, differences in their response show that the research survey respondents have opposing ideas to the research question. The research finding is in accordance to my own opinion with regards to the research topic. Therefore, the research findings actually helped me validate my idea with regards to this issue.

Wednesday, November 6, 2019

Bright Horizons Business Analysis

Bright Horizons Business Analysis Free Online Research Papers The company Bright Horizons offers innovative, employer sponsored quality child care and early education. Bright Horizons can be identified in the early education industry based on the definition of an industry which is a â€Å"group of organizations offering a similar product or service to the same customer group and/or drawing from the same resource pool (Strategic Planning a Practical Guide 2008). Bright Horizons does however, have some differences from other early education industries mainly on account of the fact of being employer sponsored. Therefore, it can be set apart from other early education centers since it can be considered a private early education industry as well. Early childhood education has many factors that link education to economic growth. The key macroeconomic variables that affect early education industries such as Bright Horizons are employment and increased gross domestic product. According to Belfield of the University of New York (2006), the increase in employment can be accounted for because, â€Å"female labor force participation rates are increased somewhat, although the effects appear to be largely a function of mothers’ entry into the workforce a few time periods earlier than they otherwise might have. The labor force participation effects for those who receive early child education are also positive.† By more mothers entering the workforce because they feel comfortable sending their child to an early childhood center welfare also decreases. Early childhood education centers, such as Bright Horizons, are programs that allow parents to work, so in turn households increase labor market participation. Furthermore, studies show that children who invest time at a young age in early childhood ed ucation centers are said to have increased high school graduation and progress into college. Additionally, they go into the workplace at a higher rate than children who do not participate in these centers, therefore, raising economic growth. A second macroeconomic variable that affects Bright Horizons is gross domestic product. Gross domestic product in this case is increased based upon human capital. Human capital is not only a function of the initial stock the individual is born with (genetic luck) but is produced over the life cycle by families, schools, and firms, although most discussions of skill formation focus on schools as the major producer of abilities and skill (Cavlier, 2006). By acquiring specific numbers of children product placement and construction increase. For example, by opening up a new early childhood education center new buildings are needed, new toys need to be acquired, and other supplies in general need to be purchased. The companies making these products also have an increase in production when working mothers feel content with their child’s early childhood center. This increase is based upon a working mother’s comfort level allowing her to be more productive in the work en vironment. A central conclusion of a vast body of research is that in most countries efficiency in public spending would be enhanced if human capital investment were directed more toward the young and away from older and less-skilled for whom human capital is a poor investment (Cavlier, 2006). Bright Horizons faces several challenges and opportunities in the future. The main challenge comes into play because the company is an employer sponsored company. The challenge of being an employer sponsored company lie within companies themselves wanting to invest in an early childhood education center. With the job forces decreasing many companies do not want to involve themselves with the extra expense to open or invest in such a large facility. Another challenge is the turn-over rate. The average pay for a child care worker is $12.34 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This often means that someone interested in the field will use early childhood education centers as a stepping stone to furthering their career in education. On the other hand, some of the opportunities an early childhood education center such as Bright Horizons has to offer are job availability, location, and increasing number of women entering the workforce. With employment expected to increase by 18% in the next 8 years there are many opportunities to find a position in an early childhood education center. Additionally, with the availability increase more facilities have to be built therefore, the locations of centers will be more desirable. More women entering the workforce allow more children to have the chance to attend early childhood education which in turn creates more positions to work for. In conclusion, by looking at the projected employment outcomes for early childhood education center this is a growing industry. This industry will seemingly continue to grow for years to come making more need for centers such as Bright Horizons to exist. References Arts Manager. (2008). Strategic Planning. Retrieved March 14, 2008, from artsmanager.org/strategic/primer/chapter3.cfm Blefield, C. (2006). Macroeconomics of Preschooling. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://nieer.org/resources/research Cavlier, A. (2006). Economics and Early Childhood Economics. Retrieved March 16, 2008 from iscpa.org Research Papers on Bright Horizons Business AnalysisPersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyInfluences of Socio-Economic Status of Married MalesStandardized TestingResearch Process Part OneThree Concepts of PsychodynamicHip-Hop is ArtEffects of Television Violence on ChildrenPETSTEL analysis of IndiaAssess the importance of Nationalism 1815-1850 EuropeRelationship between Media Coverage and Social and

Monday, November 4, 2019

The Significance of Art Education to Stakeholders Thesis

The Significance of Art Education to Stakeholders - Thesis Example The results indicate that most of the teachers, administrators, and members of the board of education valued art education. This is seen where 70% of the teachers felt that art education should not be eliminated during budget cuts, with 20% of them disagreeing with the idea that art education should not be eliminated during budget cuts. In addition, 80% of the administrators and all members of the board of education agreed that art education should not be eliminated during budget cuts. This response is an indication of the high value teachers, administrators, board of educators and the commuity at large, have to art education. This high regard for art education is seen where all teachers agree that art education increases the visual and spatial skills of the learner. This response was also seen with the administrators and board of educators. Where, 60% of the administrators strongly agreed and 40% agreed, while 40% of the members of the board of education strongly agreed with 60% agr eeing, that art education increases the visual and spatial skills of the learner. These results are in agreement with literature, that indicated that the arts play an important role in enhacing the intrinsic value and general academic achievement of the student (Ashford, 2004,

Saturday, November 2, 2019

The Rationale for Banning The Outsiders Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Rationale for Banning The Outsiders - Essay Example As an initial matter, before addressing why the book was banned in certain schools, it is useful to summarize the plot generally. The protagonist in this story was Pony Curtis. Pony was a young boy whose parents had died in a car accident; as a result, he was cared for by his twenty year old brother, Darry. Pony was poor, though clever and a good student, and he did what all boys in this neighborhood did. He joined a gang, named the Greasers, and hung out with his gang as if they were an extended family. There was a rival gang, the Socs, made up of rich boys from a another neighborhood. A gang rivalry existed between the two, and one day a fight ensued in which Pony's good friend killed a member of the Socs gang in self-defense. Pony's friend later died, and another friend was shot by the police after going crazy and trying to rob a store with a gun. Pony, however, did not suffer the same fate as his friends; rather, after being inspired by a letter from Johnny, he decided to reconci le with his older brother and to try and improve his life. In short, Pony decided to reject the outsider lifestyle and to participate more productively in his society and community. Given the hopeful ending, the transcending of obstacles, it seems odd that the book was so heavily criticized. The first The first basis for criticism was that the novel promoted gangs. More specifically, this line of reasoning argued that the novel, by including both rich and poor children in gangs, glamorized and encouraged young readers to pursue similar affiliations. In this way, the novel's critics believed that the novel was divisive, socially destructive, and immoral. It was socially divisive because it pitted rich boys against poor boys; it was socially destructive because violence was used as a conflict resolution tool for disputes; and, finally, it was immoral because the gang lifestyle promoted laziness, substance use, and revenge. Indeed, the central role of gangs in the novel was a central foundation for the criticism which ensued. A second criticism was the use of violence by young boys. One can distinguish between clubs with mild-mannered rivalries and gangs with deeper notions of rivalry and revenge. It is one thing to portray youthful pranks; in the minds of the novel's critics, however, it was quite another thing to portray children and adolescents intending to cause serious physical harm and genuine emotional trauma on their rivals. A particular example was the use of weapons in the novel. These gang members, for instance, carried knives, bats, and guns. Rivals weren't simply embarrassed. Quite the contrary, as in the case of Johnny's conflict with Bob, some people were killed. Thus, in addition to the portrayal of gangs, the vivid depiction of violence also furnished a strong basis for the subsequent criticism. A third criticism was the prevalence of substance use and abuse by underage boys. The references to cigarettes and alcohol were also found objectionable. These boys were underage. By associating public figures, in this case fictional characters from a popular novel, with substance abuse, many people argued that schoolchildren would be influenced to behave similarly. Today's cigarette-smoking adolescents will become tomorrow's marijuana users was the fundamental criticism. These